Read the following article:New York TimesNovember 3, 2009To Some, Winner Is Not American EnoughBy GINA KOLATAAs soon as Mebrahtom Keflezighi, better known as Meb, won the New York City Marathon on Sunday, an uncommon sports dispute erupted online, fraught with racial and nationalistic components: Should Keflezighi’s triumph count as an American victory?He was widely celebrated as the first American to win the New York race since 1982. Having immigrated to the United States at age 12, he is an American citizen and a product of American distance running programs at the youth, college and professional levels.But, some said, because he was born in Eritrea, he is not really an American runner.The debate reveals what some academics say are common assumptions and stereotypes about race and sports and athletic achievement in the United States. Its dimensions, they add, go beyond the particulars of Keflezighi and bear on undercurrents of nationalism and racism that are not often voiced.“Race is still extremely important when you think about athletics,” said David Wiggins, a professor at George Mason University who studies African-Americans and sports. “There is this notion about innate physiological gifts that certain races presumably possess. Quite frankly, I think it feeds into deep-seated stereotypes. The more blatant forms of racial discrimination and illegal forms have been eliminated, but more subtle forms of discrimination still exist.”There are few cases parallel to Keflezighi’s in American sports. Some are noteworthy because of how little discussion, by comparison, they generated over the athlete’s nationality. For example, the Hall of Fame basketball player Patrick Ewing (Jamaica) and the gold medal gymnast Nastia Liukin (Russia) were born abroad, but when they represented the United States in competition, they seemingly did not encounter the same skepticism that Keflezighi has.Richard Lapchick, the director of the Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport at the University of Central Florida, said the argument about Keflezighi “tells us there are people that still have racial red flags go up when certain things happen.”He added: “Many people think that with an African-American president, we are in a postracial society. Clearly, we are not.”The online postings about Keflezighi were anonymous. One of the milder ones on Letsrun.com said: “Give us all a break. It’s just another African marathon winner.”A comment on The New York Times’s site said: “Keflezighi is really another elite African runner by birth, upbringing, and training. Americans are kidding themselves if they say he represents a resurgence of American distance prowess! On the other hand, he is an excellent representative of how we import everything we need!”In a commentary on CNBC.com, Darren Rovell wrote, “Nothing against Keflezighi, but he’s like a ringer who you hire to work a couple hours at your office so that you can win the executive softball league.”Keflezighi said on Monday that remarks about his heritage were not new. “I’ve had to deal with it,” he said. “But, hey, I’ve been here 22 years. And the U.S.A. is a land of immigrants. A lot of people have come from different places.”The last American to win the New York race, Alberto Salazar, was also born in another country. He came to the United States from Cuba when he was 2. When he won, though, he did not hear grumbling about whether he should be considered an American. He pointed out two differences between his case and Keflezighi’s: Salazar is Hispanic, not black; and when he won in 1982, the Internet, in its current form, did not exist.The argument that Keflezighi is not really an American makes little sense, Salazar said in a telephone interview.“What if Meb’s parents had moved to this country a year before he was born?” he said. At what point is someone truly American? “Only if your family traces itself back to 1800, will it count?”The issue previously arose when Keflezighi won a silver medal in the 2004 Athens Olympics, said Weldon Johnson, a founder of Letsrun.com. So when the negative postings appeared Sunday, he said, “I did not like seeing them, but I was not surprised.”Perhaps the passion over Keflezighi’s victory stems from the despair over the state of American distance running. Americans used to be the best, in the 1970s and 1980s. But their time of glory waned as East Africans began dominating.The success of distance runners from Kenya and Ethiopia fostered a lore of East Africans as genetically gifted, unbeatable, dominant because of their biology. Scientists have looked for — but not found — genes specific to East Africans that could account for their distance ability, said John Hoberman, a professor at the University of Texas at Austin who studies race and sports.But, he said, “there is a difference between saying we don’t have a scientifically respectable conclusion and the very broad and perhaps mistaken claim that there is no physiological phenomenon here whatsoever.”Regarding the question of whether East Africans have a genetic advantage, Hoberman said, “We don’t know.”“The more relevant question is, who gets to represent the country?” he said, adding, “Only racists will insist that ‘our’ athletes meet specific racial criteria.”Consternation over the race of elite American athletes is not new. A century ago, the notion of a “great white hope” emerged — a white boxer who whites hoped could beat the black heavyweight boxing champion Jack Johnson.In running, as African-American athletes excelled in sprints, they were said to lack the endurance or the fortitude to prevail in longer distances, Wiggins said. Then, when East Africans started to thrive, the argument changed to one claiming there are special East African genes.“From my perspective, it is racist thinking at its utmost,” Wiggins said.In Salazar’s view, Keflezighi’s victory is another indication that American distance running is coming back. Keflezighi never ran competitively before he came to the United States, and he did all his training here.“Can American-born guys and gals compete?” Salazar said. “I think we are starting to see that.“Does Meb resolve that argument? No. He wasn’t born here.“And neither was I.”
1.) Is Keflezighi an American?
2.) What makes him an American or non-American?
3.) Does this instance show inequality? Explain?4
.) What are some stereoptypes in this article?
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Leslie H.
ReplyDelete1.) Yes i beleive that Keflezghi is an American.
2.) He embodies the american dream,and he stands for all that is good about america. The ablity to persue his dream.
3>) Yes, it does show racial inequality. Some tried to argue that the only because of his genetics he won. They also said when are white runners going to win, and thats not fair, because he worked hard for that victory. Salazr said that he did all of heis training here at American facilities. He made yet another comment that shold inequality.
4.) Some sterotypes include that east africans are good sprinters. He said that its his genetics.
1.) I believe that he is American.
ReplyDelete2.) He lived in U.S since he was 12, it doesn't matter if he was born in Eritrea. He spent most of his life here and not there.
3.) It does show racial inequality. They said just because he is from East Africa he won. In my opinion if you work hard, and put all of you into it, you will win, doesn't matter what race you are.
4.) Some of the stereotypes are that Africans are good in sports.
1. yes.
ReplyDelete2. if he's an american citizen and has been in america for 22 years, i think it's safe to say he's an american.
3. it shows inequality because when alberto salazar, who is hispanic and has been in america since he was 2, won this race this race last time, no one argued over whether he was american or not. but when keflezighi, who is black won, everyone questioned whether he is an american or not.
4. the article stereotypes east africans as being good at running.
1.) yes, i do think that he is an american.
ReplyDelete2.) he has lived in America since he was 12 years old. It shouldnt matter where he was born, he has lived most of his life here.. not in Eritrea.
3.) this does show racial inequality because they said he won because of where he is from. and when the other guy won they didnt question whether he was american or not but when the black guy wins they did.
4.) this stereotypes africans as being good runners.
1) yes.
ReplyDelete2) he has lived here most of his life, and is an american citizen. it doesnt matter where he came from. he is an american.
3) it shows racial inequality by saying he won because of his race. just because he was black they questioned him. if he would have been white he wouldnt have been questioned.
40 aficans as great runners.
1 yes
ReplyDelete2 hes lived here since he was 12
3 they said he won because hes black
4 African Americans are very good at sports
1.yes
ReplyDelete2.He is american because he has lived there since he was 12.
3.He won because of his race.
4.blacks are good at sports
1. I believe he's an American.
ReplyDelete2. He's lived here since he was 12 and is legally recognized as a US citizen.
3. It shows racial inequality because they questioned him about winning the race because he was black.
4. It stereotypes blacks as good runners.
1. yes
ReplyDelete2. He is legally recognized as an american.
3. Is shows inequality because they questioned him about winning the race because he is black.
4. One sterotype is thinking that blacks run faster.
1.yes he's an american.
ReplyDelete2.he has lived in american since he was 12 so he's an american.
3. they say he won because he was black, that shows inequality.
4.a sterptype is saying that blacks can run faster.
1) yes, i believe he's american
ReplyDelete2) he's lived here for a good bit of his life, and is as a US citizwn.
3) he won because of his race.
4) saying that black run faster is a stereotype.
1.yes, hes an american
ReplyDelete2. he is legally recgonized as an american citizen
3.he won basically because he is an african american
4. he is a good runner because he is black.
1) yes i think he became an american overtime but in his heart he always gonna rememeber where he's from and i think he SHOULD always know that he's still at least a little bit forgein ( and be proud to be it!!)
ReplyDelete2) depending to the law HE IS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN, he lived in the USA for a long time and passed it to become an american citizen (legally), but from birth he isn't an american ... but the states became to HIS HOME, HIS COUNTRY, and HIS NATIONALITY !
3)yes i think it shows racial inequality towards african american and it also shows a typical stereotype for those people.
4) that he only got that good and won because HE IS AN AFRICAN AMERICAN, cause "all" african americans are fast and though good in running
1.)yes
ReplyDelete2.)Because he is an American citizen
3.)Yes, because people believe he could have won just because of his race. Which is not fair to him because he won the race because he is a good runner.
4.)That people thought the guy won just because he was an African American and it is believed that they all run faster than other races.
1.yes
ReplyDelete2.He's an American citizen because he passed the test to become one and lived in the US for a long time.
3.Yes I do think that this article shows racial inequality because they questioned him about winning the race based on his race.
4.A stereotype is that all African Americans can
run faster than everyone else.
1. Yes he's an American
ReplyDelete2. He became an American citizen&has been living here the majority of his life. What criteria for being American is he not meeting?
3. Yes; the only reason his victory is being questioned is because of his race. Had he have been white&from another country, I don't believe this controversy over his win would even exist.
4. There are plenty of stereotypes in this article on both black&white people. For example, white people have the stamina for running long distances but black people do not. Black people are good for sprinting but when it comes to being long-lasting(boxing or distance running)they are no good.
1.) He's lived here for 22 years, yes he's american. If he really wasn't an american, like here illegally, he would be getting pressed by the police. I think that if you live somewhere long enough, you become one of them. And really, none of us are "true Americans" except for native Americans.
ReplyDelete2.) He is American because he's lived here pretty much all his life, and lives like us, and with us.
3.)It shows that a lot of people still have racism and prejudice. He is no better than us, he has no special advantage.
4.) African people are faster.
People born in the U.S. have more rights.
We don't want people from other competing with us, unless it makes us look good in front of the entire country.
*Entire World
ReplyDelete